# umount /mnt/mydisk
umount: /mnt/mydisk: device is busy
umount: /mnt/mydisk: device is busy
You have to be out out /mnt/mydisk directory when you try to unmount. If that doesn't do the trick then you have to find out what process is using the /mnt/mydisk mount point. Here is how to:
Lets suppose the /mnt/mydisk is mounted from /dev/sdb2.
# fuser -m /dev/sdb2
You will get a number which is the process number you have to stop or kill.
# ps -ef | grep process_number
You can kill this process by using
# kill -9 process_number
but if you can stop the application which uses that process then the better.
Anyway, you can do the unmount command after that.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
How to unmount when the device is busy
Sometimes you end up with an error while running umount.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Quick Filesystem Remount in Read Write
As you may already have experienced, you end up with e read-only filesystem during the Linux boot. The boot sequence prompts you to input the root password to continue if some filesystem could not be mounted and that results in a read-only root partition where you have a bash prompt where there is nothing you can do but look at files and wonder what could be wrong.
Well, of course, you need to adjust the filesystem mount scheme from /etc/fstab but that's readonly and what you should do is to to mount the root filesystem in read-write mode. Simple command does the trick:
bash# mount -o remount,rw /
E voila !. You have a read-write filesystem now where you can change the files as you need.
Happy fixing!
Well, of course, you need to adjust the filesystem mount scheme from /etc/fstab but that's readonly and what you should do is to to mount the root filesystem in read-write mode. Simple command does the trick:
bash# mount -o remount,rw /
E voila !. You have a read-write filesystem now where you can change the files as you need.
Happy fixing!
Friday, March 13, 2009
Cygwin Rsync over SSH Hang - Solution
It is well known that running rsync over SSH to pull data from a windows cygwin host hangs and there is no good workaround but to not use SSH PIPES. Well, the not USE_PIPES workaround is not so good since it fails sometimes and the major drawback is the speed transfer which is about 30-40% less then using a normal SSH pipe.
My solution addresses both security and transfer speed and there is no need to compile or modify any software whatsoever.
The idea is to use SSH tunnel with port forwarding.
Lets say we have the following hosts:
Host_A: Windows Cygwin Host, running SSH server and has the data to be backed up
Host_B: Linux Host, The backup server where the backup scripts are running
We want to initiate a command on Host_B that will pull data from Host_A. Normally, you will do this by running:
Host_B# rsync ---verbose --stats --progress --rsh=ssh HOST_A: /backups/
That command will hang after a while. Here is how to do it with my workaround:
1) Install Rsync Daemon (as a Windows service) on Host_A:
Host_A# cygrunsrv.exe -I "Rsync" -p /cygdrive/c/cygwin/bin/rsync.exe -a "--config=/cygdrive/c/cygwin/etc/rsyncd.conf --daemon --no-detach" -f "Rsync daemon service"
2) Create /etc/rsyncd.conf on Host_A
----------
use chroot = false
strict modes = false
address = 127.0.0.1
[data]
path = /cygdrive/c/
comment = data
-----------
Note: I used 127.0.0.1 the address to bind to be more secured. No other hosts will connect to rsync server other then the host itself.
3) Verify your rsync server
Host_A# rsync rsync://localhost/data/
4) Lets create the SSH tunnel
Host_B# ssh -L 1234:127.0.0.1:873 root@Host_A
It prompts for Host_A password
Check if you have port 1234 binded on Host_B. If not, something went wrong with previouse command
Host_B# netstat -lnp | grep 1234
5) Check if you can see the remote rsync server on local Host_B port 1234
Host_B# rsync rsync://localhost:1234/data/
6) Proceed with the backup command
Host_B# rsync --verbose --stats --progress --recursive rsync://localhost:1234/data/ /backups//
It will not hang and you will get all the data.
More then that, if you are running rsync the second time, for the same data, then it will be much faster then doing it as you normally do with --rsh=ssh option.
Still have problems ? No, I don't think you will...but if so - please let me know
My solution addresses both security and transfer speed and there is no need to compile or modify any software whatsoever.
The idea is to use SSH tunnel with port forwarding.
Lets say we have the following hosts:
Host_A: Windows Cygwin Host, running SSH server and has the data to be backed up
Host_B: Linux Host, The backup server where the backup scripts are running
We want to initiate a command on Host_B that will pull data from Host_A. Normally, you will do this by running:
Host_B# rsync ---verbose --stats --progress --rsh=ssh HOST_A:
That command will hang after a while. Here is how to do it with my workaround:
1) Install Rsync Daemon (as a Windows service) on Host_A:
Host_A# cygrunsrv.exe -I "Rsync" -p /cygdrive/c/cygwin/bin/rsync.exe -a "--config=/cygdrive/c/cygwin/etc/rsyncd.conf --daemon --no-detach" -f "Rsync daemon service"
2) Create /etc/rsyncd.conf on Host_A
----------
use chroot = false
strict modes = false
address = 127.0.0.1
[data]
path = /cygdrive/c/
comment = data
-----------
Note: I used 127.0.0.1 the address to bind to be more secured. No other hosts will connect to rsync server other then the host itself.
3) Verify your rsync server
Host_A# rsync rsync://localhost/data/
4) Lets create the SSH tunnel
Host_B# ssh -L 1234:127.0.0.1:873 root@Host_A
It prompts for Host_A password
Check if you have port 1234 binded on Host_B. If not, something went wrong with previouse command
Host_B# netstat -lnp | grep 1234
5) Check if you can see the remote rsync server on local Host_B port 1234
Host_B# rsync rsync://localhost:1234/data/
6) Proceed with the backup command
Host_B# rsync --verbose --stats --progress --recursive rsync://localhost:1234/data/ /backups/
It will not hang and you will get all the data.
More then that, if you are running rsync the second time, for the same data, then it will be much faster then doing it as you normally do with --rsh=ssh option.
Still have problems ? No, I don't think you will...but if so - please let me know
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)